Skip to content
StepUp Law logo StepUp Law

What a Florida Trustee May Spend the Trust’s Money On

Reasonable is measured three ways, and the third one is about the trustee rather than the trust.

Section 736.0805 limits what a trustee may spend administering a trust. It is one sentence, no Florida court has construed it, and the yardstick it sets is more specific than it first appears.

Book a free 30-minute consult Free consult with a Florida trust attorney.

Quick Overview

Expenses of administration

Topics to Know HideShow

Below, we walk through the 4 issues that decide whether this is the right move for you. Jump to any one.

  1. Three yardsticks The trust property, the purposes of the trust, and the skills of the trustee.
  2. The third one is unusual A trustee who claimed expertise is measured against that claim.
  3. Not the same as trustee compensation That is a different section with a different test.
  4. No case law No Florida decision cites this section.

That’s the quick version. The details below are what decide your situation, and where the costly mistakes hide.

Three yardsticks in one sentence

In administering a trust, the trustee shall only incur expenses that are reasonable in relation to the trust property, the purposes of the trust, and the skills of the trustee.

Section 736.0805, Florida Statutes. Enacted in 2006 and never amended since.

Reasonableness here is not free floating. The statute names three things to measure against, and they pull in different directions.

The trust property makes size part of the standard. The same expense can be reasonable in a trust holding several million dollars and unreasonable in one holding sixty thousand. The Legislature carried that logic further in section 736.0414, which lets a trustee terminate a trust outright where its value cannot justify the cost of administering it.

The purposes of the trust ask what the money is being spent toward. A trust created to hold and maintain a family property will support expenses that a trust created to hold marketable securities and distribute income would not.

The third yardstick is about the trustee

The last limb is the one worth pausing on, because it does not describe the trust at all. Expenses must be reasonable in relation to the skills of the trustee.

That connects directly to section 736.0806, under which a trustee who has special skills, or who was named in reliance on their representation of special skills, must use them. Read the two together and a pattern appears. A professional trustee who was appointed because of claimed expertise, and who then pays an outside adviser to do the very thing that expertise covers, is charging the trust for something the appointment already paid for.

The reverse is also true and is worth saying, because it protects ordinary trustees. A family member serving without any relevant background is measured against that. Hiring an accountant, a lawyer or an investment adviser is not extravagance when the trustee has no professional skill of their own to apply, and section 736.0807 expressly permits delegation.

This is not the trustee’s fee

The two questions get run together constantly and the law treats them separately. What the trustee is paid comes under section 736.0708, where the Second District has held that reasonableness is decided on a multi factor test rather than by hours times a rate. What the trust spends on administration comes under this section. A trustee can have a defensible fee and indefensible expenses, or the reverse.

Both show up in the same place. Under section 736.08135(2)(b) the accounting must show all cash and property transactions and all significant transactions affecting administration during the period, including compensation paid to the trustee and to the trustee’s agents. That is usually where a beneficiary first sees the shape of the spending.

No Florida court has construed this section

Our review found no decision citing section 736.0805, in the Florida state courts, the Florida federal district and bankruptcy courts, or the Eleventh Circuit, searching every precedential status rather than the default view.

So the questions a beneficiary would actually bring are open. Whether an expense that fails this section is recoverable from the trustee personally, or merely disallowed. Whether the three yardsticks are cumulative, so that an expense must satisfy all of them, or whether a court weighs them together. Whether a trustee who obtained the beneficiaries’ agreement to an expense is protected. And how this section interacts with an exculpation clause under section 736.1011. None of that has been decided in Florida under this section number.

Expenses that do not look proportionate

The statute measures spending against the size of the trust, its purposes, and the skills of the person doing the spending.

Frequently Asked Questions

What expenses can a Florida trustee charge to the trust?

Only reasonable ones, measured a particular way. Section 736.0805 provides that in administering a trust, the trustee shall only incur expenses that are reasonable in relation to the trust property, the purposes of the trust, and the skills of the trustee. All three are part of the test.

Is this the same as the trustee’s fee?

No. Trustee compensation is governed by section 736.0708 and is measured against a multi factor test the Second District adopted from West Coast Hospital Association. This section is about the expenses of running the trust, meaning what the trustee spends on third parties and on administration, not what the trustee pays themselves.

What does “in relation to the trust property” mean?

It makes the size of the trust part of the standard. An expense that would be sensible for a large trust can be unreasonable for a small one, because the statute asks about proportion rather than about the expense in isolation. Section 736.0414 takes the same idea further and allows an uneconomic trust to be terminated where administration cost cannot be justified at all.

Why do the trustee’s skills matter to what may be spent?

Because a trustee who holds themselves out as having expertise is expected to use it, under section 736.0806. If a professional trustee pays an outside adviser for work their own claimed expertise covers, the proportionality question is different from the same expense incurred by a family member with no relevant background.

Where do I see what the trustee has spent?

In the accounting. Section 736.08135(2)(b) requires the accounting to show all cash and property transactions and all significant transactions affecting administration during the period, including compensation paid to the trustee and the trustee’s agents.

Common Situations

A small trust with professional fees eating the income. Proportion is written into the statute, and section 736.0414 addresses the extreme case.

A corporate trustee outsourcing work it was hired for. The skills limb, read with section 736.0806, is the argument.

A family trustee hiring an accountant. Delegation is permitted under section 736.0807 and the skills limb cuts in this trustee’s favour.

Expenses you cannot identify in the accounting. Section 736.08135(2)(b) requires them to be shown, including what was paid to the trustee’s agents.

Sources of Law


Updated on August 14, 2026. Reviewed by Kevin D. Klagge, Esq., Fla. Bar No. 99502. Attorney Kevin Klagge represents families, businesses, and international clients in estate and tax planning, business structuring, and international law, with a focus on Florida legal tools. He litigates estate and business issues in court. General information about Florida law and published court decisions, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created. Reading this page does not make us your lawyers. Please do not send confidential details until we have connected.

Have trust expenses reviewed

Bring the accountings. Expenses have to be disclosed in them, which is usually where a proportionality problem first becomes visible.